近日，美國(guó)聯(lián)邦調(diào)查局（FBI）前翻譯西貝爾·埃德蒙茲（Sibel Edmonds）2015年的一段涉疆采訪視頻曝光，她在采訪中明目張膽地說出了美國(guó)的陰謀。

埃德蒙茲在采訪中說起美國(guó)亂疆的計(jì)劃和手段，全部言中當(dāng)下美國(guó)的行徑：

“新疆是中國(guó)能源的大動(dòng)脈。我們想要逐漸在中國(guó)內(nèi)部打性別牌、種族牌，說新疆的少數(shù)民族沒有自己的土地，我們要幫助他們，他們?cè)馐軌浩?，說中國(guó)在屠殺他們、折磨他們。”

We want to gradually, by playing the gender card and the race card internally, well, for that part of the world to play the minority without land, we're going to help them, they are being oppressed, Chinese gunning them down and torturing them.

埃德蒙茲說，美國(guó)的計(jì)劃就是把在阿富汗、烏克蘭、伊拉克使用的辦法炮制到新疆上來，憑空制造話題，趁虛而入。

你將會(huì)看到，類似在烏克蘭上演過的那些元素將再度出現(xiàn)。要讓新疆成為下一個(gè)臺(tái)灣。You're going to see similar elements that we have been seeing, let's say, with Ukraine. Xinjiang is going to be the next Taiwan, OK?

雖然美國(guó)大打人權(quán)牌，但真實(shí)情況是，“我們從來不在乎百姓，對(duì)不起，人不屬于我們的利益范圍，除非人可以被利用，可以用來達(dá)到我們的目的”，她嬉笑地說出這句話，毫不掩飾其冷血和虛偽。

We never cared about people. Sorry. That's not within the interest area, unless it can be utilized, capitalized upon to get our objective...

“中國(guó)的說法比西方更接近事實(shí)”

美國(guó)在緊鑼密鼓地塑造輿論場(chǎng)，不斷散播涉疆謊言和偏見。

然而，埃德蒙茲在節(jié)目中承認(rèn)：“中國(guó)的說法比西方人的說法更接近事實(shí)?！?/p>

可惜99%的人，就連《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》都是帶著傾向報(bào)道新疆的。但其實(shí)不是的，從來都不是那樣的。Unfortunately, 99% of people, even though New York Times, with its own tilt, covered it. But it's not. It's never been the case.中國(guó)政府的說法，比《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》聽信土耳其人的那個(gè)說法要靠譜得多。So the Chinese government's version of the story, is much closer than when the New York Times takes the version of the Turkish side.

聽到這些話，不知那些唯西方媒體是瞻、無腦跟風(fēng)的人會(huì)作何感想？

“中國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)得很巧妙，不會(huì)上當(dāng)”

盡管美國(guó)對(duì)新疆野心勃勃，但他們也清楚認(rèn)識(shí)到，中國(guó)不是可以隨便欺負(fù)的。

埃德蒙茲贊嘆中國(guó)在美國(guó)的計(jì)謀面前，“應(yīng)對(duì)得很巧妙、邏輯清晰”。

我一直在關(guān)注他們?nèi)绾螒?yīng)對(duì)，如何處理……他們?cè)谏虡I(yè)利益方面邏輯太清晰了。When I keep looking at how they respond things, how they handle it...They are so logical, in terms of business interest...他們處理得非常巧妙，西方國(guó)家很難拋出誘餌說“咬鉤吧”。他們看透了這個(gè)局的本質(zhì)，不會(huì)中計(jì)的。They are handling it very smartly and it will be hard for the Western powers to try to throw the bait and say,"Ok, bite it." They know what the game's about. And they are not about to bite.