二零一五年SAT創(chuàng)作歷經(jīng)改革創(chuàng)新之后，從這三年的學(xué)員成績(jī)分?jǐn)?shù)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析看來，reading, analysis和writing中大伙兒廣泛成績(jī)相對(duì)性低一點(diǎn)的便是analysis這一項(xiàng)（這一項(xiàng)是主要是有關(guān)reasoning邏輯判斷的考察），這也是全世界范疇內(nèi)SAT創(chuàng)作最廣泛的成績(jī)排列狀況。

我乃至見過一些英國(guó)人教版SAT創(chuàng)作，做為創(chuàng)作教師，考自身的漢語考試，創(chuàng)作成績(jī)也是8/7/8，唯一沒有100分的便是analysis一項(xiàng)。實(shí)際上大伙兒無須太過度苛責(zé)analysis的成績(jī)，原本創(chuàng)作便是一個(gè)主觀性學(xué)科，SAT創(chuàng)作也是評(píng)析性創(chuàng)作，類似我國(guó)的閱讀題一樣，如同我們答語文高考，也一樣難以在閱讀題上獲得100分。

每一個(gè)人針對(duì)文章內(nèi)容都是有自身不一樣的了解，因此 要是大伙兒在SAT創(chuàng)作analysis上盡量獲得相對(duì)性的高分?jǐn)?shù)——六分或是7分，再加上別的二項(xiàng)相對(duì)性好評(píng)分的reading和writing，那麼總體成績(jī)就很開朗了。

依據(jù)SAT創(chuàng)作考察方位看來，除開剖析事實(shí)論據(jù)以外，大家務(wù)必也要關(guān)心文章閱讀作者是怎樣“排兵布陣”，機(jī)構(gòu)事實(shí)論據(jù)，證實(shí)論點(diǎn)論據(jù)的，也就是要剖析文章閱讀的論證方式。

所以說，evidence事實(shí)論據(jù)處理的是“用哪種來論述”的難題，而reasoning論述處理的則是“怎么使用事實(shí)論據(jù)證實(shí)論點(diǎn)論據(jù)”的難題。一篇議論文，假如僅僅好多個(gè)事例，數(shù)據(jù)信息，客觀事實(shí)等事實(shí)論據(jù)簡(jiǎn)易闡述乃至是亂七八糟的列羅得話，那麼閱讀者也一樣會(huì)一頭霧水，不明就里，邏輯性錯(cuò)亂，也不會(huì)接受到文章內(nèi)容要想傳遞的最關(guān)鍵的內(nèi)容。因此 高品質(zhì)的議論文一定會(huì)選用清楚的并列結(jié)構(gòu)，有效的構(gòu)造分配，暢順的行文思路來進(jìn)行自身的闡述。

有關(guān)reasoning一項(xiàng)考察的最粗淺的一部分便是針對(duì)文章的結(jié)構(gòu)掌握，普遍的議論文邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)有：

Pattern 1 Definition

(1) add to the definition by offering specific examples;

(2) provide information about history, location, context, or usage;

(3) explain how the term differs from a similar word or phrase;

(4) further define the key term by introducing its antonym, or term opposite in meaning.

Pattern 2 Comparison and Contrast

(1) With the help of comparison, authors can help readers better understand the things being compared. For example, comparing something abstract with something concrete and familiar may help readers easily know the former.

(2) With the help of contrast, authors will be able to emphasize something effectively by putting it in front of its opposite. For example, by putting the beautiful and the ugly, or the good and the evil together, an author can easily convince readers the beauty or kindness of a person.

Pattern 3 Cause and Effect

The process of explaining how an event leads to or produces another is the pattern of cause and effect. In this pattern, if A leads to B, A is called the cause while B the effect. The pattern of cause and effect, when used, helps readers to have a clear understanding of not only what happens or what happens first, but more importantly why something happens, which is essential for knowing about an event.

Pattern 4 Time Order

Writers use the process pattern to tell their readers how something works, happens, or develops.

(1) describe what made a particular span of time eventful or memorable, making people realize the significance or influence of something;

(2) chart the career of an important figure, helping readers to have a better understanding of the person discussed;

(3) explain how some theory, invention, or activity came to be part of culture or history, building a general background for readers or to help them realize the significance of them.

Pattern 5 classifications

In the classification pattern, the order of the supporting details is also not important. However, there is a critical difference between simple listing and classification. Paragraphs relying on the classification pattern always make the same point: They tell the reader how some larger group can be broken down into smaller subgroups, or classes, each with its own defining set of characteristics. The use of classification patterns can help readers to understand easier abstract or complicated concepts, ideas, or events.

有關(guān)邏輯判斷考察的較為刻骨銘心的一部分便是針對(duì)原文章閱讀邏輯性寫作邁向的考察，因此 除開上邊提及的一種相對(duì)性簡(jiǎn)易的reasoning以外，大伙兒假如想在reasoning此項(xiàng)再獲得大量成績(jī)得話，就需要對(duì)文章內(nèi)容的語句和語句中間的邏輯性，文章段落和文章段落中間的邏輯性剖析的越細(xì)膩越全方位越好。而這一工作能力并不是一朝一夕能練就的，必須大伙兒開展很多的高品質(zhì)的閱讀文章正宗的議論文才可以漸漸地提升 ，這也是reasoning為何難能可貴分的緣故。

此外，我都提議大伙兒在考試的情況下還可以適度的用自身習(xí)慣性的標(biāo)記或是注釋的方法開展細(xì)膩的標(biāo)明，那樣你能對(duì)本文的邏輯性保證一目了然。下邊我給大伙兒挑選了一篇文章，另外為大伙兒開展了更細(xì)膩的邏輯性剖析，大伙兒能夠以這一做為參照。請(qǐng)大伙兒讀文的情況下細(xì)心感受下邊上的大字一部分內(nèi)容。這就是針對(duì)這篇文章閱讀最細(xì)膩的邏輯判斷的剖析。